BR π€π€ βBir/barβ in Aramaic and BN π€π€ βBin/Benβ are both translated as son in english, but what are their ancient origins?
Learning Aramaic & Hebrew, it always confounded me how Hebrew uses only BN ΧΧ for son, while Aramaic uses BR π€π€ or ΧΧ¨βfor son (singular) and BNY π€π€π€ or ΧΧ Χβfor son in the construct form which is translated as sons of. Aramaic also uses the plural noun form BNβYN π€π€π€π€ or BNβYM π€π€π€π€ meaning sons.
BR, ΧΧ¨β, π€π€ (noun, masc) in Aramaic corresponds to the Akkadian word for young bull, young calf which can come from two words: buru or biru. This is kind of like the slang term for a young child in english: kidβwhich really means a young goat. Over the course of time, the word became concrete and greatly utilized.
BN, ΧΧ , π€π€ (noun, masc) in Hebrew corresponds to the Akkadian verb to build, create, to engender (a child) which is: βbanuβ . In Aramaic the verb BNY ΧΧ Χβ, π€π€π€ βBin-nyβ also, means to build, to construct or it can mean the masculine noun for an architect, builder.
The Sumerian-Old Akkadian masculine noun for son is: dumunita(h), dumu-nita [See pg 16 under βmale childβ]
πΈ 12/11/3 πΈ




Leave a comment